Mobile app development
Native iOS, .NET MAUI and React Native, chosen by what the app actually needs rather than by what we happen to prefer. The engineers who build the app can also own the API behind it.
Three platforms, one honest recommendation
Native iOS
Swift and SwiftUI
When the app needs the platform: background location, HealthKit, push behaviour, offline sync or App Store features that a wrapper cannot reach.
.NET MAUI
C# and XAML, one codebase for iOS and Android
The natural choice when your backend is already .NET: the same models, validation rules and developers cover the API and the app.
React Native
TypeScript, shared with your web front end
Sensible when a React web application already exists and the mobile app should reuse its components, state and team.
How we choose
The first conversation is about the device features you need, the team that will maintain the app after launch and the backend it talks to. If one codebase can serve both stores without fighting the platform, we say so. If your app needs native iOS behaviour, we say that instead of selling a cross-platform build that will be rewritten in a year.
What ships with the app
- The API it depends on. Our .NET and Python engineers sit in the same team, so the app and its backend are not two vendors blaming each other.
- Store submission handled, including the signing setup, privacy declarations and release notes, with the pipeline that rebuilds and resubmits.
- Crash and usage reporting wired before launch, so the first bad release is visible in minutes rather than in reviews.
- Tests at the levels that pay off: unit tests for logic, and automated journeys for the flows that would cost you money if they broke.
Planning a mobile app?
Describe the users, the device features and the backend you already have. You get a platform recommendation with reasons and an estimate within one business day.